神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/00422731
このアイテムのアクセス数:
10
件
(
2024-04-27
01:01 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
00422731 (fulltext)
pdf
2.38 MB
3
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
00422731
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
アジア市場経済化のコーポレート・ガバナンス制度構築の評価手法
アジア シジョウ ケイザイカ ノ コーポレート ガバナンス セイド コウチク ノ ヒョウカ シュホウ
その他のタイトル
A Study of Evaluation Method on Corporate Governance Systems in Asian Transition Economies
著者
著者名
金子, 由芳
Kaneko, Yuka
カネコ, ユカ
所属機関名
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
収録物名
国際協力論集
巻(号)
13(2)
ページ
49-86
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2005-11
公開日
2007-06-07
抄録
This study aims at proposing a better evaluation method on the development of corporate governance mechanisms in Asian transition economies. The analysis is composed of two parts. The first part is a comparative analysis of preceding proposals of evaluation standards by leading international institutions, including the OECD's “Principles of Corporate Governance" (first appeared in 1998, revised in 2004) , the EBRD's “Principles of Corporate Governance and Corporate Governance Checklist" (2000) , the World Bank's “Template for Country Assessment of Corporate Governance, Revision 3," (2003) , and the OECD's “White Paper on Corporate Governance in Asia" (2003) , as well as recent active works of economic analysis of financial laws such as La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes, Shleifer, & Vishny (1 996) and Shleifer, Glaeser, La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes & Djankov (2003) providing justifications for standardization of Anglo-American-style corporate governance models. The major finding in this part is that those evaluation standards differ each other in quite significant way revealing each different policy stance in both technical and fundamental levels. For example, in a technical level , the EBRD's Checklist and the WB's Template share the same serious concern on the market-base corporate governance and the less detailed considerations for non-market-base corporate governance, while showing a common strong bias towards Anglo-American standard in the choice of items and indicators for evaluation, which might reflect their basic policy stance to promote and transplant a single sophisticated international standard to every recipient. On the other hand, the OECD's Principle and its paraphrase given by the OECD's White Paper in the Asian context take much more multi-optional approaches, while searching for better fit designs for each local socio-economic situation. The second part of this study, based on critical results of the above comparative study, elaborate own evaluation method to be used for searching out better fit corporate governance designs for Asian transition economies, including China, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, all of which shoulder both tasks of ‘transition' and ‘development'. Reference is made to the project formation and evaluation methods in the ODA activities such as Project Design Matrix developed by JICA and being improved further especially for the purpose of ‘policy-based' aides. Since the framework of corporate governance evaluation is considered as 'an analytical tool of policy-makings on institutional buildings and hence can be developed in parallel with the evaluation method on ‘policy -based' programs in ODA.
カテゴリ
国際協力研究科
国際協力論集
>
13巻
>
13巻2号(2005-11)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
0919-8636
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10418744
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
NAID
110002339419
CiNiiで表示
URI
http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/jics/
ホームへ戻る