神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81009639
このアイテムのアクセス数:
33
件
(
2024-04-26
20:39 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81009639 (fulltext)
pdf
1.76 MB
27
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81009639
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
防衛省・自衛隊による能力構築支援の課題 : 「パシフィック・パートナーシップ」における米軍の経験から学ぶ
その他のタイトル
Challenges of Capacity-Building Assistance Programme by the Ministry of Defense and the Japan Self-Defense Forces – Learning from the US ilitary’s experiences in the Pacific Partnership 2016
著者
著者名
木場, 紗綾
著者名
安富, 淳
収録物名
国際協力論集
巻(号)
24(1)
ページ
103-123
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2016-07
公開日
2016-11-28
抄録
This article identifies three major challenges in Japan’s Capacity-Building Assistance(CBA)– conducted under the MoD/JSDF providing the militaries in the Asia-Pacific region with training and education in the field of non-traditional security. First, the current legal system confines the CBA to be a military-to-military assistance scheme dismissing any assistance to foreign civilian officers and agencies. Any development assistance to civilian individuals and authorities falls under the responsibility of the Official Development Assistance(ODA)which is administered by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs(MoFA). The revised 2015 Development Charter continues to prohibit the ODA assisting foreign militaries. Moreover, under the current laws, the JSDF is principally not allowed to provide any civilian(and defense) equipment with foreign militaries. Nor is it able, under the present CBA scheme, to construct buildings and local infrastructures and grant to foreign militaries. These limits have hindered the CBA from comprehensive defence assistance targeting civilian/military blended counterparts. The CBA needs comprehensive programmes that require extended coordination with other agencies such as the MoFA. Secondly, the CBA’s strategy is absent. There is a critical lack of strategic views amongst the MoD and JSDF on political impacts that the CBA could bring forth. The current CBA is designed in such a way that the MoD/JSDF collects information on the requests from the militaries of the Asia-Pacific region and construct programmes to meet their demands. The current CBA programme designing method does not well correspond to Japan’s strategic interests of today, but it rather simply is adapting itself to their demands. Thirdly, the CBA only targets the militaries of the Asia-Pacific region. There are other ongoing assistance programmes similar to the CBA but administered under other authorities and given to other states than in the Asia-Pacific. These similar and related programmes that are fragmented within various agencies in Japan need to be coordinated and integrated to attain maximum effectiveness. The examinations of the Pacific Partnership 2016 compare how the US military and the JSDF utilised the opportunity for capacity-building activities to the Philippine civilian and military counterparts. The US’s experiences illustrate that the presence of a clear effectiveness evaluation matrix built based on its strategic assessment in the Philippines has given the US military flexible approaches to the assistance. The JSDF’s activities, on the other hand, under the legal restrictions, are confined to only a few types of assistances within the humanitarian field. Such limit has discouraged the current CBA activities involving civilian individuals and authorities abroad. The international recognition on the JSDF’s activities thus remains minimal. In order to overcome these challenges, the existing legal frameworks primarily need large-scale revisions. Whilst such requires considerable time and efforts, other measures could be taken under the present condition. First, the CBA programmes need to integrate the institutional memories of Japan’s recent peacekeeping efforts; Japan has ample experiences and knowledge on the JSDF’s efforts of collaborating with its civilian agencies including MoFA, Japanese embassies abroad, Japan International Cooperation Agency(JICA), humanitarian aid organisations, and non- government organisations(NGOs). The CBA strategy needs a re-design so that the CBA’s efforts by the JSDF could be consistently channeled into subsequent assistance projects to be continued by these civilian agencies. A new CBA strategy could also include collaboration with other private agencies that provide foreign militaries and security-related officers with training and education, such as those organised by the Sasakawa Peace Foundation and the Japan Foundation.
カテゴリ
国際協力論集
>
24巻
>
24巻1号(2016-07)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
0919-8636
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10418744
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/jics/
ホームへ戻る