神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81011857
このアイテムのアクセス数:
12
件
(
2024-04-26
00:28 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81011857 (fulltext)
pdf
1.48 MB
4
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81011857
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
財政健全化機関としての韓国国会予算政策処の概要とその評価
ザイセイ ケンゼンカ キカン トシテノ カンコク コッカイ ヨサン セイサクショ ノ ガイヨウ ト ソノ ヒョウカ
その他のタイトル
Current Status and Evaluation of the National Assembly Budget Office of Korea
著者
著者名
上野, 宏
Ueno, Hiroshi
ウエノ, ヒロシ
収録物名
国際協力論集
巻(号)
27(1)
ページ
99-116
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2019-07-31
公開日
2019-08-09
抄録
After the world great recession (2007-2009) caused by nonperforming subprime loans in U.S.A., many developed countries are facing the problem of ever looming budget deficits and public debts. As an almost consensus, many economists and government officials think the solutions are three: mandatory debt ceiling law, medium term fiscal framework with hard budget constraints, and independent fiscal institution. This paper study the independent fiscal institution (IFI) by focusing on the National Assembly Budget Office (NABO) of Korea, which is the second largest IFI in the world next to Congressional Budget Office of U.S.A.. By studying NABO, this paper intends to abstract lessons learnt from NABO’s experience of about 16 years, so that we can establish better IFIs in the world particularly in Japan. Approach to the study is simple. I tries to evaluate NABO as an IFI mainly using the OECD principles for IFIs. The OECD principles define the necessary and desirable features for IFIs, and hence, they can work as a set of criteria to evaluate any IFI. By evaluating NABO, we can abstract merits and demerits of NABO type IFI. The results of the evaluation are as follows. (1) the commitment of the Korean government to NABO is evidenced by increasing its staff numbers and budgets over time. (2) its legal base is sound. (3) NABO’s objective is defined clearly in law, but the objective lacks one important feature which is the enlightenment of citizens through transparency. (4) its mandates are well defined. There are few problems, though, which are (a) a new mandate of analyzing national fiscal management plan is not undertaken yet by NABO, (b) there are overlapping mandate between NABO and National Accounting Office, and (c) the mandate to analyze any policy related requests by individual national assembly members seems to be an over service of NABO. (5) its functions are proper. (6) its work program is proper except for three problems: (a) ex-post evaluation of each policy is not the work for NABO but for the National Accounting Office, (b) analysis of proposals by individual assembly members is an over service of NABO, and (c) no disclosure of NABO analysis on the proposals by individual members is against the transparency principle of IFIs. (7) NABO’s independence might be compromised by the power of the National Assembly Chairperson in firing and hiring NABO’s top and the NABO officials at the level or above division chiefs. (8) NABO’s economic model to assess and evaluate any new policies is not open to the public which is against the principle of transparency of IFIs. Overall, NABO is a successful IFI and we can learn from its features. Of course there are some shortcomings such as described above and they should be rectified.
カテゴリ
国際協力論集
>
27巻
>
27巻1号(2019-07-31)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
0919-8636
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10418744
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/jics/
ホームへ戻る