神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81012018
このアイテムのアクセス数:
178
件
(
2024-05-08
13:06 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81012018 (fulltext)
pdf
1.04 MB
43
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81012018
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
道徳的規制に関するアメリカ連邦最高裁判所判決と裁判官の投票行動の計量的分析
その他のタイトル
Morality Policy in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-2018 : Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Decision Making
著者
著者名
井上, 司
収録物名
国際文化学
Intercultural Studies Review
巻(号)
33
ページ
1-25
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科
刊行日
2020-03-25
公開日
2020-03-27
抄録
Moral issues such as abortion, capital punishment, premarital sex, and drug use have become heavily politicized as one focal point of contemporary ideological conflict in the United States. Over the last several decades, social conservatives and traditionalists have attempted to protect various forms of regulations that sought to restrict private behavior traditionally deemed “immoral” and challenged the increasing predominance of progressive values on social policy issues as symbolized by the rise of “culture war”. Whereas the U.S. Supreme Court has played a significant role in developing the polarized political discourse through its rulings, little research has been conducted that empirically examines the Supreme Court’s decisions and the voting behavior of the Justices focusing on cases involving morality policies. This paper aims to provide a brief overview of Court’s judicial review cases on moral issues from the Warren Court to the Roberts Court and perform a logistic regression analysis to identify political factors that can affect Justice’s decision-making in those cases. The statistical analysis demonstrates that Justices’ ideology, religion, the federal government as a litigant, and amicus curiae briefs filed by third parties have a significant effect on how they vote in the moral cases. The study suggests that while the Justices’ decision making based on the political factors constitutes the attitudinal differences between the Warren and successive Courts in court rulings on moral issues, the Supreme Court after the replacement of Justice Warren have not shown as much willingness to uphold government intervention as can be reasonably expected from their conservatism.
キーワード
道徳的政策
保守とリベラル
司法行動論
政治的意思決定モデル
文化戦争
カテゴリ
国際文化学
>
33号(2020-03-25)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
eISSN
2187-2082
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
関連情報
URI
http://web.cla.kobe-u.ac.jp/kbkjnl
ホームへ戻る