神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14094/90004299
このアイテムのアクセス数:
4
件
(
2024-04-26
15:55 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
90004299 (fulltext)
pdf
274 KB
5
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
90004299
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
Accountability of Administration in Japan after the Mid-1990s
著者
著者ID
A0297
研究者ID
1000090242049
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=6e4534b7a0b6668b520e17560c007669
著者名
角松, 生史
Kadomatsu, Narufumi
カドマツ, ナルフミ
所属機関名
法学研究科
収録物名
Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht
Journal of Japanese law
巻(号)
16(31)
ページ
5-20
出版者
Deutsch-Japanische Juristenvereinigung
刊行日
2011-09
公開日
2017-11-06
抄録
The concept of "accountability" (akauntabiritî) was introduced into Japanese public discussion in the middle of the 1990s and was translated as "duty to explain" (setsumei sekinin) in Japan. The concept was first introduced in the purpose clause of the Administrative Information Disclosure Act (1999) and was followed by three other laws (Incorporated Administrative Agencies, etc. Information Disclosure Act (2001), Government Policy Evaluations Act (2001), and Public Record Management Act (2009)). In this article, these laws and the Public Comment Procedure (1999 Cabinet Decision and 2005 amendment of Administrative Procedure Act) are referred to as "accountability related legal schemes (ARLS)” and their features are examined. The ARLS need to be put into the context of the governance movement toward "structural reform" that began in the mid-1990s. This article compares and analyzes how "accountability" or "duty to explain" is to be attained in each ARLS under the following perspectives: (a) how and what do the administrative organs have to "explain"?, (b) Who are the administrative organs accountable to? and (c) does accountability focus on the outcome or the process? The ARLS can be seen as a set of rules that are imposed upon an administrative organ as one of the actors participating in a democratic process. Such rules regulate how the administrative organ produces information and crystallizes and stores them in documents as a medium. They also regulate when the organ has to provide such information stocks to other actors. Each legal scheme should be examined from the perspectives of what kind of communication arena it will open up and how it would contribute to control administrative activities.
カテゴリ
法学研究科
学術雑誌論文
権利
© Deutsch-Japanische Juristenvereinigung
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
journal article
言語
English (英語)
ISSN
1431-5726
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
ホームへ戻る