神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14094/90009196
このアイテムのアクセス数:
16
件
(
2024-04-25
18:17 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
90009196 (fulltext)
pdf
519 KB
16
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
90009196
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
The Formation of Regional Spaces by Agreements : Is it a Valid Approach to Regulate the Shape of Future Communal Spaces Based on (Majority) Consensus Among the Stakeholders?
著者
著者ID
A0297
研究者ID
1000090242049
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=6e4534b7a0b6668b520e17560c007669
著者名
Kadomatsu, Narufumi
角松, 生史
カドマツ, ナルフミ
所属機関名
法学研究科
収録物名
Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht
Journal of Japanese law
巻(号)
25(50)
ページ
[49]-63
出版者
Deutsch-Japanische Juristenvereinigung
刊行日
2021-01-05
公開日
2022-05-11
抄録
The City Planning Act (1968) serves as the foundation of Japan’s legal framework with respect to city planning. However, the Act on Special Measures concerning Urban Reconstruction (2002) plays an equally important role today. The latter has been revised several times, and multiple agreement systems among private landowners have been put in place to realize the formation of micro-level regional community spaces through initiatives from and consensus among land owners and other related parties (Urban Reconstruction Pedestrian Route Agreements, Facility Location Guidance Promotion Agreements, and City Convenience Increase Agreements.) After explaining these agreement systems, this paper explores the following questions: (1) How are these agreement systems related to the transformation of tasks for city planning in Japan? How will they cope with the contemporary issues of population decline and “urban spongification”? (2) These agreement systems form regional community spaces that have “public” significance via the agreements of landowners who are “private individuals” (a unanimous agreement is necessary for some systems and a considerable number of landowners suffices for others). The agreements affect various stakeholders of the corresponding spaces. Additionally, for certain agreement systems, the agreement of “current” land owners binds “future” land owners. What are the justifications on which the agreements of current land owners affect other stakeholders and bind future land owners? How can the agreement systems be compared with the building agreements set forth for the Building Standards Act? (3) Is it possible to understand these agreement systems from the perspective of “participation” in the formation of public spaces?
カテゴリ
法学研究科
学術雑誌論文
権利
© Deutsch-Japanische Juristenvereinigung
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
journal article
言語
English (英語)
ISSN
1431-5726
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AA11156539
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
https://develop.mpipriv.de/index.php/zjapanr/article/view/1524
ホームへ戻る