神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/00517641
このアイテムのアクセス数:
20
件
(
2024-04-26
08:44 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
00517641 (fulltext)
pdf
1.68 MB
20
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
00517641
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
ニーチェとオイディプス
ニーチェ ト オイディプス
その他のタイトル
Nietzsche und Odipus
著者
著者名
谷本, 愼介
Tanimoto, Shinsuke
タニモト, シンスケ
所属機関名
神戸大学国際文化学部
収録物名
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学国際文化学部紀要
巻(号)
26
ページ
1-33
出版者
神戸大学国際文化学部
刊行日
2006-07
公開日
2007-02-23
注記
本文ファイルは、国立情報学研究所CiNiiより提供されたものです。
抄録
Current national debates on gender suggest the difficulty of addressing questions of gender justice. What these debates indicate, however, is that individual worldviews or preferences regarding gender are more diverse than most conventional feminists have thus far imagined. Although feminists have argued for a society that enables a wide variety of lifestyle choices for women as well as men, they have yet to present a concrete picture of such a society. In this article, I attempt to begin to answer the normative question of gender justice from a pluralist point of view. I draw on John Rawls's work regarding political liberalism as a major pluralist normative theory, and review some of the important feminist critiques of Rawls, especially those focusing on the issue of the family. Rawls recognized the family as an important institution in the basic structure of society, and saw the family as a medium for social and cultural reproduction. Against this backdrop, I attempt to illustrate a pressing general task for pluralist gender theory by examining debate on the family as presented by Rawls and feminist theorists. For the feminist argument, I focus on the work of Susan Moller Okin. Gender can be best understood as a kind of 'comprehensive doctrine' (Rawls), in which the social world is understood and constructed using gender categories. On this basis, gender justice can be conceptualized as a form of justice among different comprehensive gender doctrines. This, however, causes a number of problems for feminists as it exacerbates the liberal problem of sharp 'public' and 'non-public' distinctions. According to Okin, this distinction cannot be sustained, not only because it masks grave injustices in 'non-public' spheres but also because the 'non-public' inevitably affects the 'public,' undermining the very basis that Rawls relies on for his 'well-ordered society' to be stable. Okin's arguments are unsuccessful in several respects. First, her assumption regarding justice or injustice in the family is dubious. Second, her concept of gender equality fails to overcome current problematic gender doctrines. Third, she fails to see the truly normative nature of Rawls's theory. However, her points well illustrate gaps in Rawls's theory and suggest a pressing task for pluralist gender theory, which is her true contribution. The task is to articulate internal concepts of justice in a variety of social spheres so as to relativize now-problematic effects of current gender doctrines.
キーワード
父殺害
近親相姦
オイディプス神話
生殖理論
アンティゴネー
Vatermord
Inzest
Odipus-Mythos
Zeugungs-Theorie
Antigone
カテゴリ
国際文化学研究 : 神戸大学大学院国際文化学研究科紀要
>
26号(2006-07)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
1340-5217
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10436600
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
NAID
110005859519
CiNiiで表示
ホームへ戻る