神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81004600
このアイテムのアクセス数:
9
件
(
2024-04-19
11:48 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81004600 (fulltext)
pdf
538 KB
2
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81004600
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
アメリカの社会学Ph.D.プログラムにおける「コア」に関する一考察
アメリカ ノ シャカイガク Ph.D. プログラム ニオケル コア ニカンスル イチコウサツ
その他のタイトル
What Constitutes of "Core Curriculum" in the Education of American Sociologists
著者
著者名
川嶋, 太津夫
Kawashima, Tatsuo
カワシマ, タツオ
所属機関名
神戸大学大学教育研究センター
収録物名
大學教育研究
巻(号)
04
ページ
1-13
出版者
神戸大学大学教育研究センター
刊行日
1996-03
公開日
2013-03-27
抄録(自由利用可)
Current dabete on reforming graduate education in Japan, which emphasizes the excellencies of American graduate schools and tries to introduce their system into Japan, mostly neglects the examination of actual training process. Structural features of American graduate programs appear to be similar. The requirements and their sequenses to doctoral degrees at various institutions, for example, show rather same patterns. The coursework at the first one or two year(s), is followed by the some kind of comprehensive/preliminary examinations and finally working on the dissertation. But the content of coursework and the way to administer the examinations differ from one discipline to another and even in the same discipline from one department to another. Especially one of significant aspects of the homogeneity-heterogeneity argument is as to the similarity of the curriculum in one discipline, since the existence of similarity of the curriculum means the consensus on what constitutes of the "core" of one discipline as well as the integrity of it. American Sociological Association and many concerned sociologists have been examined this problem since 60s. They conclude that "Theory", "Research Methods" and "Statistics" have been the "core" of graduate curriculum in the education of sociologists, based on the analysis of courses listed in Guide to Gradaute Department of Sociology since then. Some argue, however, that sociology is divided into two theoretical camps, positivistic and interpretive, in addition to the division between qualitative methodologists and quantitativeones. Therefore to determine the exact "core" of sociology curriculum reqires the carefull examination of course syllabi of each department. By doing this we can also determine whose and what writing is considered as "canon" in sociological knowledge today.
カテゴリ
大學教育研究
>
04号(1996-03)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
1340-8550
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10452935
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
http://www.iphe.kobe-u.ac.jp/kiyoh.html
ホームへ戻る