神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81004627
このアイテムのアクセス数:
6
件
(
2024-04-20
09:49 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81004627 (fulltext)
pdf
105 KB
2
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81004627
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
学生による授業評価 : 保健学科の課題の実証的研究
ガクセイ ニヨル ジュギョウ ヒョウカ ホケン ガッカ ノ カダイ ノ ジッショウテキ ケンキュウ
その他のタイトル
Student Evaluations : An Empirical Study of a Health Sciences Seminar
著者
著者名
久間, 圭子
Hisama, Keiko
ヒサマ, ケイコ
所属機関名
神戸大学医学部保健学科
著者名
日高, 正巳
Hidaka, Masami
ヒダカ, マサミ
所属機関名
神戸大学医学部保健学科
収録物名
大學教育研究
巻(号)
06
ページ
1-10
出版者
神戸大学大学教育研究センター
刊行日
1998-03
公開日
2013-04-10
抄録(自由利用可)
This is a sequel to the article by Hisama entitled "Student Evaluation: New Challenges for the Department of Health Sciences (Part I)" featured in the previous issue of Kobe Journal of Higher Education. Since 1994, there has been a significant increase in the number of Japanese colleges and universities that have adopted student evaluations upon completion of a course. However, the practice seems to be mainly limited to private universities which are having difficulty securing a sufficient number of applicants as the college age population decreases due to the declining birthrates. Kobe university, a national university, has not yet adopted the practice of distributing student evaluations. The present study reports the results of student evaluation for a seminar entitled gensho kodoku in which students read articles written in foreign languages. Since the department first opened in April, 1995, this was the first such seminar offered. The class was mandatory for all nursing students. The instructors coordinated the syllabi and class content. Subjects: The subjects were 72 nursing students (71 female and 1 male) and 9 instructors. There were 6 male instructors (all physicians) and 3 female instructors with nursing degrees. Methods: A student evaluation was constructed by choosing items from "ICU student evaluation scale" developed by researchers at a major private university in the Tokyo area. The instrument used for the current study had seven questions in each of the following four areas: Lecture Content, Class/Course, Study Guide, and Instructor. Results: Two significant findings were: (1) there were considerable individual differences among the instructors, but two faculty groups (medical and nursing) showed similar means, and (2)two instructors who gave the highest grades to their students as compared to their peers in the respective groups received the lowest overall scores from the students. It was concluded that student evaluations would help to improve the quality of teaching by giving instructors constructive feedback on a regular basis.
カテゴリ
大學教育研究
>
06号(1998-03)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
1340-8550
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10452935
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
http://www.iphe.kobe-u.ac.jp/kiyoh.html
ホームへ戻る