神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81008851
このアイテムのアクセス数:
9
件
(
2024-04-25
17:41 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81008851 (fulltext)
pdf
266 KB
2
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81008851
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
Improving Remedies at the WTO Dispute Settlement for Developing Countries
著者
著者名
Vazquez Martinez, Rodrigo Alberto
所属機関名
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
収録物名
六甲台論集. 国際協力研究編
巻(号)
16
ページ
1-23
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2015-03
公開日
2015-04-15
抄録
The central pillar of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) multilateral trading system is the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), its most important contribution for the stability of global trade. It establishes the rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes at the WTO. There is a general perception in most developed countries that the Dispute Settlement System works well, and the assessment of the system by their scholars has been positive. However, it is also undisputable that there are many aspects where the system is lacking. This article proposes an academic, yet pragmatic perspective, which takes the position of developing countries at the WTO Dispute Settlement System. It examines three remedy proposals (monetary compensation, cross-retaliation and collective retaliation) in the light of the ongoing New Negotiations on the DSU and existing academic literature. The New Negotiations on the DSU aim to improve the rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes under the WTO regime. The negotiations are not intended to generate revolutionary changes in the system, but to improve it by permitting minor changes. Thus, the fundamentals of the current system must be kept intact to not alter with its effectiveness and reputation. The new negotiations are to give a voice to the concerns of those members who have yet to participate in the system, the majority of developing countries, so as to provide them with an incentive to settle disputes at the WTO. This article provides a compatibility study of the three proposals with the current system, so as to identify which proposals positively incorporate the needs of developing countries, while not altering with the fundamentals of the current system. This article concludes that two of the three proposals, cross-retaliation and collective retaliation, do not alter the fundamentals of the current system and incorporate the needs of developing countries.
カテゴリ
国際協力研究科
六甲台論集. 国際協力研究編
>
16号(2015-03)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
English (英語)
ISSN
1346-0293
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AA11501998
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
ホームへ戻る