神戸大学附属図書館デジタルアーカイブ
入力補助
English
カテゴリ
学内刊行物
ランキング
アクセスランキング
ダウンロードランキング
https://doi.org/10.24546/81009705
このアイテムのアクセス数:
9
件
(
2024-05-04
22:17 集計
)
閲覧可能ファイル
ファイル
フォーマット
サイズ
閲覧回数
説明
81009705 (fulltext)
pdf
411 KB
7
メタデータ
ファイル出力
メタデータID
81009705
アクセス権
open access
出版タイプ
Version of Record
タイトル
開発援助機関におけるIAM(異議申立審査制度)の課題 : 手続規定の比較考察
その他のタイトル
Issues of Independent Accounting Mechanisms (IAM)of International Development Agencies : A Procedural comparison
著者
著者ID
A1671
研究者ID
1000010291981
KUID
https://kuid-rm-web.ofc.kobe-u.ac.jp/search/detail?systemId=f2f28f96165ce602520e17560c007669
著者名
金子, 由芳
Kaneko, Yuka
カネコ, ユカ
所属機関名
国際協力研究科
収録物名
国際協力論集
巻(号)
24(2)
ページ
1-14
出版者
神戸大学大学院国際協力研究科
刊行日
2017-01
公開日
2017-02-22
抄録
This article attempts at a comparative analysis of institutional and procedural characteristics of the Independent Accounting Mechanisms (IAM) which have been established by leading international development agencies since the 1990s for the purpose of examination and settlement of public complaints in regard of the environmental and social problems in the course of development projects funded by these agencies. In terms of the institutional independence, most of the IAMs reveal limitations due to their nature as an internal organ for the compliance, having mere functions of fact-finding and/or advisory to report to the top management without decision-making power. Nevertheless, some advanced attempts for independence have been sought within such limitation, such as the institutional design of the IAM at the EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) which separates the management and the examiners by inserting the third organ of PCM Officer as a shield between them, allowing flexible coordination for effective solutions. In terms of the eligibility in the application for complaints, some IAMs feature a seemingly open window in the initial stage but then narrow it in the succeeding phases, as in the case of the World Bank and IFC/MIGA, which often result in an ultimate rejection after all prolonged procedure. An active approach is pursued by certain IAMs such as the ADB in interpreting the eligibility so as to incorporate substantive considerations into the procedural criteria. An interesting difference also exists in the utilization of mediation-type procedures: while some IAMs such as the World Bank encourage “Early Solutions” for a closer dialogue between the management and the complainants, which is often criticized as a tactic to postpone the ultimate solution, the EBRD centers on the adjudication-style procedure except for the cases involving policy-formation via interactive consultations. In terms of the enforcement of the IAM report, more elaborations should be made for minimizing the management prior intervention to the IAM decision, and for the encouragement of the social watch over the overall IAM functions.
カテゴリ
国際協力研究科
国際協力論集
>
24巻
>
24巻2号(2017-01)
紀要論文
詳細を表示
資源タイプ
departmental bulletin paper
言語
Japanese (日本語)
ISSN
0919-8636
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで学外所蔵を検索
NCID
AN10418744
OPACで所蔵を検索
CiNiiで表示
関連情報
URI
http://www.research.kobe-u.ac.jp/gsics-publication/jics/
ホームへ戻る